Customized Lean Case Studies

Author Manouk Nijhof
Abstract Reduction of lead time by making use of a customized version of POLCA (material control system of QRM), namely G-POLCA, or Generic-POLCA.
Keywords G-POLCA, Generic-POLCA, Quick Response Manufacturing, Lead time reduction
Anonym Ja
Company name
Company address
Company country
Line of business Rubber And Miscellaneous Plastics Products
(Approx.) yearly turnover 1.000.000€ - 5.000.000€
Number of employees 25 - 50
Percentage temporary workers 0% - 5%
Principal range of products Products tailored to customer specifications
Major product quantities Make-to-Engineer (one-of-a-kind)
Principal type of production organisation Shop fabrication
Who was the trigger / customer of the project? Managing Director
Project Type Lead time reduction
Lean is already fully established Neutral
What was or is the main trigger to implement Lean? Increase quality
Case Study

The central question of the research focused on what kind of pull system could reduce the lead time of a project company with extremely high variations and low volumes. The researchers made a distinction between three different systems, namely ConWIP, POLCA and Generic Polca (G-POLCA). The researchers concluded that G-POLCA would fit the organisation best. 

G-POLCA is a variant on POLCA. All POLCA-cards of the complete process should be available before the production will be started.

Top 1 waste Defects
Top 2 waste Waiting
Top 3 waste Inventory
Starting Situation

The organisation is a project organisation with a high variety in lead time. The organisation received a high number of complaints about the products of the company. The customers experienced problems with the quality of welding, gluing and the accuracy of measurements. The organisation wants to improve its quality by reducing its lead time. A better structure and overview results in less intermittent interruptions, and thus less mistakes by employees.

All projects of the company were divided over medium and large projects. Long lead times are caused by the absence of a pull system. The central question is as follows: What kind of pull system will reduce the lead time of a project company with extremely high variations and low volumes? (See the figure below for the MCT (Manufacturing Critical-path Time) of the starting situation.


Evaluation

Flow efficiency

Flow efficiency = Processing time/ lead time * 100%

Large projects: from 13,1% to 24,9% (Goal was 24,3%)

Medium sized projects: 10,6% to 12,3% (Goal was 13,6%)